Me too.

Here's Ann at her 'pick up my ball & go home' best.

Coulter & Hannity.

The dream team.

Not.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/

Arthur, you shouldn't disparage your betters.

No danger of that.

Arthur --

As an American, I'd say one of your "ilk" has an awful lot of betters to look up to.

As an American myself Seth I have to say that showbiz figures like Coulter & Hannity or Franken or Garafalo are fairly low on the list of people to admire.

C'mon, Arthur, Al Franken is probably your idol. Anyway, keep thinking, if that's what a lefty calls his thought processes. I'm having breakfast.

Later.

In an interview with George Gurley, Coulter stated that: "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times building." [Wikipedia] Ann is an attention-craving pundit and certainly not a good source
for facts.

BB --

Why is it that when someone like Dick Durbin compares GITMO with "the killing fields of the Pol Pot regime" we don't hear a single liberal remark on the absurdity of it, yet as soon as Ann Coulter says something, it's a different story?

Sounds like bias, as opposed to reason, to me.

Seth-

Senator Durbin's remarks were unfortunate and he apologized for making them.

I've yet to hear Ann Coulter apologize for advocating mass murder.

Seth,
You stated "I have no trouble understanding why liberals hate her. Like Islamofascists, they have a very real problem when anyone has the collossal nerve to speak the truth." Your first
sentence is sensible, the second makes one wonder if there is a Seth Corollary to Godwin's
Law...

In general, I am disappointed with Anne Coulter because she is wasting her talents: a person with her evident intelligence could better use her mind and verbal skills to overwhelm her opponents in debate rather than hurling rhetorical bombs designed to end discussion.

That said, in this column she does issue an important challenge to Democrats to delineate an alternative system for dealing with terrorism rather than spouting platitudes divorced from reality.

Civil Truth --

Ann is not a political figure, she is a private individual whose celebrity is based in part on her bluntly outrageous statements. Considering that the left has its Michael Moores and Al Frankens, I think it's kind of nice to have our own "pit bull", albeit an attractive one. I've read and enjoyed all of her books and never miss any of her columns.

That said, I agree that she would be a formidable debater if that had been her chosen path. I've also seen her debate people from time to time in short segments at places like O'Reilly's, and I, for one, wouldn't want to be on the opposite end of an argument with her -- luckily, LOL, we share very similar views.

And yes, this particular column does indeed challenge the Democrats to produce some real answers, though we can hardly expect that to occur. They simply haven't got a clue where terrorism is concerned, in large part because they hate Bush so much that they mistakenly treat him as the enemy instead of focusing on the real threat, in fact their actions do infinitely more to aid and abet the enemy than anything else.

BB --

LOL.