December 17, 2006
The Government Once Again....
.... proves that this is not the free country intended by our founding fathers, interfering, and not for the first time, with the competitive structure of the marketplace.
scum sucking, piece of shit, treasonous, commie liberal politicians are at the source of this particular infringement, but what's new? They always are!
In this case, the victim is a dairy farmer who chose to charge less money for his milk.
May 08, 2006
American Vs "Name-Only" American
There are no African, Mexican, Asian or other categorized Americans. This hyphenated X-AMERICAN thing has got to go. Either you're an American, period, or you're not. Becoming an American means exactly what it says: American.
The liberal "multicultural" bit that incorporates X + American is nothing more than a piece of PC crap designed to garner votes for Democrats. Prior to this boneheadedness, we American taxpayers weren't forced to translate such publications as drivers' handbooks, etc, into a trillion languages. You moved here, your priority was learning to read, write and speak the Gringo language. The left has altered that for the reason of getting votes.
When you become a naturalized American, you leave your previous nationality behind. Case closed. If you want to be a Mexican-American, stay in Mexico and just be a Mexican. If you want to be an African-American, stay in or move to Africa and be an African. How many American born citizens of foreign countries call themselves American-Africans, American-Mexicans or American-Asians?
Going further, the English language is "coin of the realm" here, total allegiance to this country should be a requirement of new citizenship, as it was when my grandparents came here from eastern Europe. Move here, enjoy the benefits of citizenship, learn the language. So let's have a look below:
The wisdom of our fathers
Teddy had it so right! Not Kennedy, but Roosevelt!
Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes
here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he
shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an
outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or
birthplace, or origin.
But this is predicated upon the person's becoming
in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be
no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but
something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one
flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and
that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole
loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
Theodore Roosevelt 1907
Well said, Teddy!
January 16, 2006
Double Standard Law For Atlantic City
New Jersey has banned smoking in all indoor public places, including bars, but has exempted casino gaming areas from the ban.
Personally, I don't believe that any government, city, state or federal, should have the right to tell a bar, restaurant or office-based business owner whether he can or cannot allow smoking in his establishment or office complex.
It is, after all, the owner's business. He or she owns or leases the property and as such has the right to determine such issues. People who do not like cigarette smoke are not forced to hang around or seek employment on the premises. They can frequent or work at places where non-smoking or anti-smoking proprieters do not allow tobacco use on the property.
The self righteous proponents of government imposed smoking bans claim that they have the health interests of non-smoking employees at heart. Balderdash! They are merely grinding an axe and using state governments as their conduits. The vast majority of the bars and restaurants I've frequented over the last few decades have had one thing in common: all, or nearly all of the employees were smokers. This means that in most cases, these smoking nazis are getting legislation enacted that "protects" these employees without their consent.
That said, I especially take umbrage with the government passing double standard laws that tilt the proverbial playing field rather than keeping it level.
Having worked in the gaming industry in Nevada, I've seen a few examples of what happens when people aren't permitted to smoke, drink and gamble at the same time -- it costs a casino some serious money.
The Jersey casinos pay a lot of taxes and their owners contribute big bucks to political campaign funds.
So the casinos are exempt from the same no-smoking law that will be enforced against smaller businesses like bars and restaurants.
For Angeloni, owner of Angeloni's II, an Italian restaurant two blocks off the casino strip, the casino exemption is a matter of dollars and cents. Customers won't be able to smoke at his tables or bar, but they will be at the city's dozen casinos.
"It's going to kill me, I know it is," Angeloni said Wednesday. "Do you know how many conventioneers eat here and come out to the bar to smoke afterward? You can kiss them goodbye, now. They won't even leave the casino."
Seeing many mom & pop businesses disappearing as giant chains emerge, concerns that can afford to charge less for products while providing more selection has always depressed me. No one can replace the local family-run butcher shop, for example. However, that's the marketplace, it's capitalism at work, and it occurs on a legal, level private sector playing field.
By exempting the casinos, which serve food and beverages in vast quantities at all hours, cheaper than the smaller bars and restaurants can afford to charge and often comped, the Jersey gubmint is in fact stacking the deck against these little guys and therefore interfering with the local marketplace.
In short, they've both infringed on the rights of business owners like so many other states have, and sabotaged the food and beverage competition for casinos whose actual specialty product is gambling.
If you're going to pass a law, it needs to apply to everybody, not just those who generate less tax revenue, employ less people and make smaller campaign contributions.
While I'm a hard core advocate of states' rights, I think this one should rightly be taken to a higher court by the small business owners who stand to lose a lot of money, if not their very businesses, by this inequity in the new New Jersey state law.
Posted by Seth at 07:27 AM |
October 24, 2005
The Right To Keep And Bear Arms
The most thorough and spot-on post I've ever seen regarding our Second Amendment rights can be found at Kender's Musings.
Posted by Seth at 08:36 AM |