June 8, 2010

A Trio Of Items

First, I must say that this Erick Erickson dude really knows how to throw a punch.

This past week, the Gulf States who hoped Barack Obama would actually do something to help them were stunned when he imposed a ban on deep water offshore drilling.

It is no exaggeration to say that as much as shrimping is part of the way of life in the Gulf Coast area, oil drilling is too. Barack Obama, with the stroke of a pen, put tens of thousands of men and women on the unemployment line.

That was no act of moderation. That was an overreaction — a desire by Obama to move the narrative from “do nothing” to “do something.” He did something alright. In his zeal to turn this from his Katrina to his 9/11 with a “Never Again” moment, he destroyed an entire industry.

That was not an act of moderation. It was a desperate, selfish bid to change the narrative, despite all sorts of collateral damage.

Let hear a loud OUCH! for Obama!

The rest here.

Second, one of Seth’s fun favorites, Julia Gorin and, killing two birds with one stone where saying “farewell” is concerned, one of the best commentaries we’ve yet to read concerning the (all too) clear, departing Helen Thomas.

By occasional reader and California resident Avi Zirler:

Dear Ms. Thomas:

I saw the clip where you told the Jews of Israel to get the hell out of Palestine and go back to Poland and Germany.

Really?

Ms. Thomas, one could expect a renowned journalist of your caliber to know that about half of the population of Israel consists of Middle Eastern Jews who where forced to flee Arab countries like Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Yemen, and North Africa. The number of those Jewish refugees far exceeded the number of the so-called Palestinian refugees. Some of them, particularly the Jews of Iraq who were extremely wealthy, were brutally forced to leave their wealth behind, and their assets were confiscated by the government.

Are you suggesting that those Jews should return to the countries who tormented them? Are your Arab friends ready to take them back?

Ms. Thomas, I heard that you are an American of Lebanese descent. I am not exactly sure what gives you the right to live on a land which was taken from the Native Americans. Who gave you the permission to live here?

Thus, Ms. Thomas, I believe that you should give these damn Jews a personal example. I therefore suggest that you get the hell out of America and go back to the Middle East, where you and your anti-Semitic ideas belong and fit in.

Yours,
Avi Zirler
La Canada, CA

My only correction for Helen Thomas is that, again, it’s not “Palestine” — it’s Palestein.

– APPLAUSE for that one!

And Third, speaking of earmarks… Were we speaking of earmarks? No? Well, we are now.

These things (earmarks) have become synonymous, and rightly so, with politicians on Capital Hill stealing — that’s right, blatantly STEALING, robbing, ripping off, burgling, pickpocketing — STEALING money from the American taxpayer to reward campaign contributors and other supporters or to help one another get reelection votes in their respective districts. It’s also a pure manifestation of that unconstitutionally sinful act known as “taxation without representation”.

With a rooftop pool and 24-hour concierge service, the new luxury condominiums off Frank Sinatra Drive here seem an unlikely spot in need of a multimillion-dollar federal giveaway.

Yet U.S. taxpayers doled out at least $8 million on a public walkway and park space in front of the Maxwell Place development here overlooking the New York City skyline - an amenity the development touts alongside its entertainment lounge, rooftop hot tub and theater screening room.

But the decision to use tax dollars to fund the walkway project was made after private developers had already agreed in 2003 to pay for it - indeed, it was a key condition for getting the project off the ground, according to public records and interviews.

Still, under the so-called earmarking process, by which Capitol Hill lawmakers slip requests for pet projects into larger spending bills, Sens. Frank R. Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, New Jersey Democrats, later pushed for millions of dollars in federal funding for the project.

In the swamp of federal earmark funding, $8 million isn’t a lot. But critics say the project is emblematic of why the earmark process so enrages many taxpayers.

Read on.

Have a nice day. :-)

by @ 1:09 pm. Filed under Just Talking
Trackback URL for this post:
http://hardastarboard.mu.nu/wp-trackback.php?p=1409

4 Responses to “A Trio Of Items”

  1. Simeon Says:

    Well, Barack Obama’s only been in office now for close to 17 months, which isn’t even 1/4 of his first term.

    You neos aren’t giving him any kind of a chance, bashing him before he can even get the swivel chair adjusted behind his desk.

    I agree on the Helen Thomas opinion, she way overstepped and demonstrated that she harbors strong anti-semitism.

    I’m not a fan of wasted tax money myself, I work too damn hard for that money they haul out of my gross income to watch the politicians fritter it away like they do.

    Two out of three sidings with rednecks, oh, my! Next thing, you’ll have me bitin’ a chaw off a hunka’ tobacco. :-(

  2. Chuck Says:

    Simeon,

    Two out of three isn’t enough. :-)

    As for the one you disagree with, I think it’s right in the bull’s eye.

    ,,,aren’t giving him any kind of a chance…

    Here at Hard Astarboard, we did give Obama a chance. We refrained from criticizing him until he had demonstrated what he is (and isn’t) about.

    The Democrats, the MSM and “progressives” at large were hammering away at George Dubya Bush before he could even finish taking the oath of office, and no matter how and what he did, they attacked him mercilessly throughout his two terms and even now, when he’s no longer in office, they are still attacking the man.

  3. Harry Says:

    Well, Barack Obama’s only been in office now for close to 17 months, which isn’t even 1/4 of his first term.

    Yes, Simeon, and in the entire “close to 17 months”, his every act as POTUS has been in violation of the Constitution.

    I am at a loss to understand why it’s so hard for liberals to grasp the simple fact that part of being an American is respecting the Constitution, which is the document that defines this nation.

    Had it not been for two hundred years of previous generations and the politicians thereof adhering to that great document, we would likely not be the wealthy, powerful and free country we are today.

    Have you read any of the pap some of the columnists in NYT and elsewhere among the quagmire of liberalism have been writing about how the Tea Partyers and the people of Arizona have been “testing” the Bill Of Rights? That’s how ridiculous the left has become: They violate or endorse violating the Constitution at every turn, then accuse the conservatives who are fighting to get us back on track of doing so!

    Hello? Come in Earth, over!

  4. Chuck Says:

    Harry,

    Me, I’m simply pissed off, LOL.

    I long ago came to the conclusion that when people who are as intelligent as all those “progressives” who made it through Law school are supposed to be are so dead set on stomping on a document that gives us what the Constitution does, they can only be doing so with the deliberate intention of destroying this country as we know it and depriving us of our liberty in order to install a communist or fascist regime of some kind.

    If they were all stupid, I might see things differently, but they’re not.

    The same applies to the liars in the MSM, who act more like propagandists than they do reporters of news dedicated to keeping the public informed in a fair and impartial manner.

    The enemy within. :-)