March 4, 2007

Slavery In History….

…. vs slavery today is the topic of an OpEd by Mona Charen.

Al Sharpton is apparently subdued by news that his ancestors were owned by ancestors of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond. New York Times columnist Bob Herbert described him as “quiet” and “reflective” — states of mind that Herbert acknowledges are “unusual” for the reverend. That qualifies as the understatement of the decade.

Sharpton indicates that the news of his ancestry brought the “complete dehumanization” of slavery home to him, and Herbert takes the opportunity to preach that “Slavery, like the past . . . is not dead. It’s not even past. It’s not something you can wish away.”

No, you can’t wish it away, but it is possible to dwell on it overmuch, as I believe we do in this country. To judge by what my children are learning in school, you’d think American history was 75 percent slavery and 25 percent everything else (and that 25 percent includes a large dollop of imperialism, racism, sexism and homophobia, leaving little time for Lincoln, Edison, Clay, Holmes, Alcott, Dickinson, Addams, Longfellow or Fulton).

Meanwhile,

Each year, an estimated 600,000-800,000 men, women and children are trafficked against their will across international borders. According to the White House, 14,500-17,500 of these are trafficked into the United States. Some are forced to work in sweatshops and farms, but most are domestic workers and prostitutes. A typical case is that of “Maria,” a Guatemalan who was lured to the U.S. by a “coyote” when she was 12. Once in Florida, she was raped and forced to submit to prostitution. She did not speak the language and was threatened with violence if she attempted to escape.

What gets me is that most of the countries that seem to turn a blind eye on human trafficking within their borders are the same ones that are permitted to bash the United States within the New York based chambers of the U.N., but I digress.

In Burma, and in several countries in Africa, children as young as 11 are kidnapped and forced to become soldiers. The State Department’s trafficking report quotes a 13-year-old former soldier from Liberia who told of being drugged. “They gave me pills that made me crazy. When the craziness got in my head, I beat people and made them bleed.”

Elsewhere, the exploitation of children for “child sex tourism” is a thriving industry. In Thailand, Cambodia and Costa Rica, as well as other nations, pedophiles traveling from all over the globe are offered their choice of male or female victims from among the poorest classes. The children can be as young as 5.

Howsomever, the international slavery problem (and the smaller, but despicable nonetheless, problem manifest among immigrants right here in the United States) is apparently not an issue to those whose only concern in that arena is to keep the guilt alive among citizens of today for the actions of long dead Americans 140 + years ago, ultimately to gain votes for a political party that was not only the party that created such organizations as the Ku Klux Klan and such doctrine as the Jim Crow laws, but also continues to con black Americans that they have their best interests at heart, while actually keeping them down. Not to mention any names, I’ll only give you a hint: It’s not the Republican Party.

Anyway, Mona Charen’s as-always right on column can be read here.

by @ 11:59 am. Filed under Uncategorized
Trackback URL for this post:
http://hardastarboard.mu.nu/wp-trackback.php?p=632

6 Responses to “Slavery In History….”

  1. civil truth Says:

    And guess which U.S. Senator is a leading advocate against
    the modern-day slave trade and sex trafficing.

    Answer here

    (Hint: it’s not Chappaquiddick Ted)

  2. Seth Says:

    Civil Truth –

    (Hint: it’s not Chappaquiddick Ted) ROTFLMAO!!!!

    I did some reading on Senator Brownback’s http://www.acf.hhs.gov/trafficking/about/TVPA_2000.pdf

    He is a pretty powerful politician in terms of the committees he’s on and is definitely a true conservative (I also like the fact that he chooses not to run in 2010 out of deferrence to his own belief in term limits), but alas, like my own Presidential choice for 2008, Tom Tancredo, he hasn’t got the name recognition of McCain, Giuliani and Romney, and that’s a deciding factor in winning the nomination. I suppose it often works out that way — the best candidates are too busy working on our behalf to spend as much time campaigning as those possessing the “names we know” seem to specialize in.

    It’s good that we have someone in the Senate who’s trying to do something about the real slavery issue rather than dwelling on the non-undoable historic one employed by the likes of the Sharpton and Jackson Comedy Team.

  3. Shoprat Says:

    A crime committed by our ancestors a century ago is relevant to these people because they benfit from the guilt.

    They do not benefit from fighting the slavery that is happening today.

    It’s not about slavery anymore.

  4. Seth Says:

    Shoprat –

    With the left, it’s never about genuine concern for anything, it’s always about whatever’s convenient for one of their political agendas.

    Their insincerity is overwhelming.

  5. Mike's America Says:

    It must have really bugged Sharpton that his people were owned by ancestors of Strom Thurmond.

    But what about Obama. His mother owned slaves. Who is he going to holler at for reparations?

    And what about Hillary? I thought she owned the black vote.

  6. Seth Says:

    Mike –

    Hillary’s having trouble with the black vote, it seems Obama’s beginning to corner that market, LOL. She is so transparent. I read that she even went to Selma to try to get it back.

    I guess since the black voting block continues to swallow the con job the Dems have been laying on them for decades, Obama’s safe there despite his mother’s proclivities.

    Meanwhile, the rest of us have to continue listening to diatribes about how we’re all responsible for what long dead people did well over a century ago, before my family was even in the U.S.

    While I despise the very concept of slavery, I can’t help but see some irony in the Sharpton-Thurmond kerfuffle. The MSM has been chaffing at the bit to go after it great guns, they just haven’t found a way to really sink their teeth into it yet — who knows? They may just lose their moment. :-)