August 18, 2010
The Best Response To This One…
…at least if one were a member of the party on the left side of the aisle, would have to be “Ouch!”
“We the people” are the familiar opening words of the Constitution of the United States– the framework for a self-governing people, free from the arbitrary edicts of rulers. It was the blueprint for America, and the success of America made that blueprint something that other nations sought to follow.
At the time when it was written, however, the Constitution was a radical departure from the autocratic governments of the 18th century. Since it was something so new and different, the reasons for the Constitution’s provisions were spelled out in “The Federalist,” a book written by three of the writers of the Constitution, as a sort of instruction guide to a new product.
The Constitution was not only a challenge to the despotic governments of its time, it has been a continuing challenge– to this day– to all those who think that ordinary people should be ruled by their betters, whether an elite of blood, or of books or of whatever else gives people a puffed-up sense of importance.
While the kings of old have faded into the mists of history, the principle of the divine rights of kings to impose whatever they wish on the masses lives on today in the rampaging presumptions of those who consider themselves anointed to impose their notions on others.
The Constitution of the United States is the biggest single obstacle to the carrying out of such rampaging presumptions, so it is not surprising that those with such presumptions have led the way in denigrating, undermining and evading the Constitution.
As is always the case with Thomas Sowell, very well put.
To truncate a bit…
It is no coincidence that those who imagine themselves so much wiser and nobler than the rest of us should be in the forefront of those who seek to erode Constitutional restrictions on the arbitrary powers of government. How can our betters impose their superior wisdom and virtue on us, when the Constitution gets in the way at every turn, with all its provisions to safeguard a system based on a self-governing people?
To get their way, the elites must erode or dismantle the Constitution, bit by bit, in one way or another. What that means is that they must dismantle America. This has been going on piecemeal over the years but now we have an administration in Washington that circumvents the Constitution wholesale, with its laws passed so fast that the public cannot know what is in them, its appointment of “czars” wielding greater power than Cabinet members, without having to be exposed to pubic scrutiny by going through the confirmation process prescribed by the Constitution for Cabinet members.
Now there is leaked news of plans to change the immigration laws by administrative fiat, rather than Congressional legislation, presumably because Congress might be unduly influenced by those pesky voters– with their Constitutional rights– who have shown clearly that they do not want amnesty and open borders, despite however much our betters do. If the Obama administration gets away with this, and can add a few million illegals to the voting rolls in time for the 2012 elections, that can mean reelection, and with it a continuing and accelerating dismantling of America.
Infuriating, at least to those of us who love America and embrace both the wisdom and the freedom guaranteed us by the Constitution, but true.
http://hardastarboard.mu.nu/wp-trackback.php?p=1620
August 18th, 2010 at 12:38 pm
Has Obama hired Blair and the Labour Party spin doctors and constitution destroyers to advise him?
August 19th, 2010 at 10:38 am
Gray Monk –
LOL!
That, or they loaned him their playbook.
However, in the case of the spirit and temperament of those of us on this side of the pond, methinks that the primary reason the left over here is so vehemently opposed to the gun ownership guaranteed all Americans by our Second Amendment is because they fear We, The People will finally reach the end of our tolerance for what amounts to treason against the Constitution they were sworn to “protect and defend” and the resulting encroachment on the freedoms defined therein, and resist somewhat more forcefully than they would like.
August 20th, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Methinks the Gray Monk may be on to something.
August 21st, 2010 at 12:46 pm
GM –
Methinks you are absatively, posolutely correct.