April 10, 2007

A Couple Of Misguided Lefties…

…(which portsiders aren’t misguided?) get their due herein, one, a punk (I truly cannot locate, after much thought, a more accurate descriptive) whose celebre eminates from among the columns of the New York Times, from his fellow Democrat and undoubtedly the best former mayor New York has seen in my lifetime despite his political career having been spent on that side of the aisle, the other, a braying, disgusting, megablubbery, smelly looking, treasonous pig comedienne cum TV personality, from one of the more aggressive right thinking political commentators of today.

First, there is Koch on Kristof.

The hostile views that Nicholas Kristof expresses in his March 18, 2007 column correspond with those held by former president Jimmy Carter.

Kristof is distressed that the Democratic Party leadership is too supportive of the State of Israel. He says that he prefers the view of U.S. Senator and presidential candidate Barak Obama who recently stated, “Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinian people,” for which he says Obama was “scolded.”

Kristof does not mention that Palestinian suffering has in large part been brought on by the Palestinians’ own actions. Their leaders rejected the United Nations vote in 1947 dividing historic Palestine into two states: one Arab and one Jewish. They supported or actively participated in at least seven wars against Israel: the 1948 War of Independence, the 1967 Six-Day War, the 1968 War of Attrition, the 1973 Yom Kippur War, the 1982 Lebanon War [1] and the 2006 Lebanon War [2]. Their leadership declared two intifadas (insurrections) in 1987 and in 2002, which still goes on.

Imagine that! Another liberal who is comfortable with ignoring the facts in order to press a political agenda. Of course, he and his fellow members of the anti-Israel persuation have no choice but to employ the communistic technique of sweeping the truth under the rug in order to replace it with propaganda for consumption by the masses. If you simply gloss over the realities, you don’t have to work all that hard at revising history, modern or otherwise — sort of like lefty teachers do in schools these days, but let’s not digress, for once (that means you, Seth).

Kristof denounces Israel’s building “a better fence” or seeking “more weaponry.” What does he mean? That in his opinion Israel may not erect a fence to help keep the terrorists out? Does he suggest that the U.S. should deny the sale of new weapons to Israel unless it also makes them available to the Palestinians? Kristof’s tortured reasoning led to the fall of the Spanish Republic to which we would not sell arms to defend itself from Franco’s fascist armies which were supported by Hitler and Mussolini.

Liberals, who yearn desperately for the implementation of that provenly oppressive failure called socialism to “come to our rescue”, never miss an opportunity to opine that any and all democracies should bend over backwards to sabotage themselves in the face of the enemy. Thus the leeches over at the ACLU, for example, are forever using the courts in an attempt to erode the security measures the United States Government takes to repel terrorism from our shores, and the liberal anti-Israel crowd demands that the Jewish state tie their own hands and that the U.S. turn our backs on them in order to allow the forces of their terrorist enemy to destroy them.

Kristof clearly wants the U.S. and the Democrats seeking the presidency to end what every president since John F. Kennedy has called “a special relationship” with Israel — that of an ally — and create a new climate of neutrality. Even the Arabs have accepted that special U.S. relationship with Israel; nevertheless, they have asked the U.S. to take the role of mediator/broker, knowing that only the U.S. would be able to get Israel to make concessions based on hopes and promises rather than concrete confidence-building measures by the Palestinians and their supporters.

Emphasis mine.


The second subject of conservative OpEd attention is a truly twisted soul who is the epitome of ugliness inside and out, and who embodies treason in a most abrasive and wingnutty way, from a forum that used to be (prior to her arrival) a light hearted, acceptable-to-all political groups, womens’ talk show.

Here is O’Reilly on O’Donnell.

Armed with propaganda and dangerous with passion, Rosie O’Donnell has turned a morning coffee klatch TV program into Al Jazeera West. Where once “The View” dealt with menopause and shopping tips, the program now routinely assassinates the characters of anyone Ms. O’Donnell finds objectionable….

Read the entire column here.

All I can say about O’Donnell is that I find her to be one of the most offensive, disgusting TV personalities in existence and one who truly doesn’t merit citizenship in our great nation. I really don’t like to say derogatory things about women (no chauvenism intended, just a conservative Jewish upbringing and a profound appreciation and respect for the female of our species) but that horrible creature is a real toilet cake.

To that end, Thespis also has a thing or two to say regarding O’Donnell that aren’t exactly rosie (pun intended)…

Trackback URL for this post:

9 Responses to “A Couple Of Misguided Lefties…”

  1. Ken Taylor Says:

    How can Democrats support Arabs and Israel at the same time ? Dems have been enemies of Israel for quite some time. They would like nothing more that to see the end of Israel and a Palestinian State encompasing the land that is now Israel. Even Carter who claims as his only legacy the peace treaty between Egypt and Israel has become an anti - semite as of late. So much so that Jewish members of his Presidential Library board have resigned as well as he being removed from a Jewish organization board after making the comment in a letter that a nomminee to the board of this Jewish organization had a name that sounded, ” to Jewish.” Democrats despise Israel and their contempt for the State is obvious in their rhetoric and their politics.

    As far as Rosie is concerned, I would rather have a severe case of food poisening then to have to listen to her mouth and her idiotic, evil and hate filled, anti - American, brainless thoughts and ideas.

  2. Gayle Says:

    Ditto what Ken said!

    “Toilet cake!” LOL! I love it. It’s so much better than the other expression. :)

    Kristof and Rosie are both offensive, but Rosie goes way further than Kristof. Also, there is the added insult of not being able to turn on Fox News for very long without having to look at her. Her face isn’t attractive to begin with and now she’s turned it into an absolutely disgusting countenance with that perpetual sneer which I think she practiced in a mirror!

    I watched the View twice I think, when it first came on. It wasn’t bad but it wasn’t my cup of tea then either. I’m not interesting in a bunch of gabbing women or their views. The show bored me to tears! Perhaps that’s why they keep Rosie on the show. It’s become offensive to many but it’s definitely not boring from everything I’ve heard. I still don’t understand why anyone other than extreme right-wing nuts would want to watch it.

  3. Seth Says:

    Ken –

    Democrats have a way of taking both sides of an argument, depending on which side is politically advantageous at a given time. The only thing they lack on either end of an issue is sincerity; If they were sincere about anything, the average Democrat could probably have a heated argument with himself all day long.

    Rosie is just plain bizarre in every way.

    Gayle –

    I only reserve the term “toilet cake” for the worst of the worst, the malodorous flotsam that drifts among the refuse in an old cesspool. Rosie qualifies.

    I’m not a “The View” type, either. However if I were, I would have stopped watching after Rosie joined the show, after first washing my TV down with a strong antimicrobial cleanser.

    I still don’t understand why anyone other than extreme right-wing nuts would want to watch it.

    I bet you meant left-wing nuts. :-)

  4. BB-Idaho Says:

    Ordinarly, I disagree with old “no-spin” O’Reilly as his spinning makes me dizzy. But I agree in this case. “Toilet Cake” is embarrassing to us thinking liberals (pardon the oxymoron, if a right side perception). The libs need an Ann Coulter, but Rosie sure ain’t it.

  5. Always On Watch Says:

    From Thespis:

    HASSELBECK: Do you believe that the government had anything to do with the attack of 9/11? Do you believe in a conspiracy in terms of the attack of 9/11?

    O’DONNELL: No. But I do believe the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics for the World Trade Center Tower Seven, building seven, which collapsed in on itself, it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved, World Trade Center Seven. World Trade Center one and Two got hit by planes. Seven, miraculously, for the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.

    Leftist idjit!

    The Dems know that one of their many Achilles’ heels is their soft stance on protecting America from terrorist attacks. So here we see in Rosie one of them trying to say, “We weren’t really so badly attacked on 9/11. The fall of the WTC was America’s fault.” Blah, blah, blah.

    Wasn’t it O’Donnell who went after Tom Selleck’s support of the Second Amendment, even though the topic of that interview was supposed to be Selleck’s latest movie?

    O’Donnell is a rude bitch–and a shrill one, at that.

  6. Shoprat Says:

    I wonder how much longer Rosie is going to be on the view. Even the libs I know don’t care for her and her open, no apologies offered, stupidity.

    As far as the Donks and Israel, they will do whatever gets them the most money, votes and power. Ethics are for the other guy.

  7. Seth Says:

    BB –

    Rosie fits the description, what can I say?

    It’s great to see you agreeing, if even for the first time, with a right-thinking point of view: It shows you are an exception among liberals, that you have a few of the right corpuscles. :-)

    I don’t think there can be a liberal version of Ann Coulter — few if any liberals have her sense of clarity.

    AOW –

    Rosie’s “scientific” folderol regarding 7 WTC reminds me of the time some auto-eroticizing DU poster performed an experiment with chicken wire and kerosene that “proved” Bush & Cheney were behind 9/11.

    I watched the clip (from YouTube or someplace) of Tom Selleck’s visit with Rosie. She was obnoxious and abusive from the start, and Selleck showed both class and restraint by attempting to reason with her and get the interview on its intended topic rather than simply recommending a good kennel for her to move into and walking out.

    Shoprat –

    I don’t think any of today’s Democrats would know an ethic if it walked up and introduced itself.

  8. T Mobile Ringtones Says:

    T Mobile Ringtones


  9. Alltel Ringtones Says:

    Alltel Ringtones