May 10, 2012

Feds Suing Their Worst Nightmare

From Godfather Politics

The Justice Department announced Wednesday that it is going to sue Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, claiming that his department is engaging in racial profiling in its well-publicized efforts to enforce U.S. immigration laws.

The feds have been seeking to bring Arpaio under judicial control and “train” his officers in constitutional traffic stops and how to reassure Latinos that the department serves them as well. Arpaio flatly refused to have his department placed under a court monitor, saying it would undermine his authority by forcing him to seek approval of policy decisions.

How the Obama Administration detests any state or officials therein who dare embrace their constitutionally granted states’ rights, and even worse when said state or official therein deigns to follow the Constitution, a document the incumbent administration holds in utter contempt.

Besides, as we know, the Party of Obama also opposes requiring proof that one is eligible to vote; This way, illegals can help elect and reelect liberal politicians.

“An illegal vote is a Democrat vote”.

He’s right, of course. Everything the “fast and furious” folks at Eric Holder’s Justice Department have been doing in Arizona has been about bringing the sheriff to heel.

Arpaio, whose office has been under investigation by a federal grand jury since 2009 for abuse of power allegations, has been a thorn in the side of Justice and the Obama Administration, first by his enforcement of immigration laws that the feds have refused to enforce, then more recently by his public investigation of President Obama, which found that the birth certificate released by the White House, and possibly other documents, is a forgery.

All of this has put Arpaio under a microscope, and critics have been looking for any excuse to call for his resignation.

Here at Hard Astarboard we consider Joe to be America’s Sheriff. If only more state and local officials stood up to Obama’s bullying.

The legal actions may be coming from Justice, but lurking in the shadows is La Raza, a virulently racist radical group that openly promotes giving the American West to Mexico. It is also a big supporter of President Obama.

Holder’s Justice Department has been giving favors to the Black Panther Party, so it’s no surprise that it would be doing La Raza’s bidding as well.

All that’s needed is for the Obama Administration and Holder to start doing the bidding of right thinking Americans.

At a press conference Wednesday, Arpaio defended himself against the impending lawsuit, saying, “If they sue, we’ll go to court. And then we’ll find out the real story. There’s lots of miscommunication emanating from Washington. They broke off communications.

“They’re telling me how to run my organization. I’d like to get this resolved, but I’m not going to give up my authority to the federal government. It’s as simple as that.”

Go, Joe!

by @ 12:20 pm. Filed under American Heroes, American Patriotism, American Rights, The Border
Trackback URL for this post:

9 Responses to “Feds Suing Their Worst Nightmare”

  1. Always On Watch Says:

    The Obama administration is all about grabbing power away from states and individuals.

    I really believe that if Obama is re-elected in November, America is doomed. The principles of federalism will be in the dust bin!

  2. The Gray Monk Says:

    Sounds like you need more than just a change of President, you need to clear out every Federal Department as well!

  3. Mrs Wolf Says:

    Always On Watch

    if Obama is re-elected in November, America is doomed

    I agree, we can’t take too much more of this.

    On the bright side, every time Obama opens his mouth these days, he seems to alienate another group of voters.

    Unless he enacts another of his executive orders, one allowing lemmings to vote, he should be out in November.

    (Fingers seriously crossed!!!!)

  4. Mrs Wolf Says:

    Gray Monk

    Seth has often suggested that what Capital Hill needs is a member of the House or Senate hanging from each lamp post, to be replaced by people with no politics experience, restricted to one term limits.

    I second the motion! :-)

    As far as Eric Holder is concerned, he is the worst kind of political hack, and a creature who has no business as attorney general of any country, no business at all holding ANY position in a government based on a constitution like America’s.

  5. BB-Idaho Says:

    If ya like that sheriff, y’all love this sheriff ..

  6. Mrs Wolf Says:


    The KKK is a Democrat organization, and I understand that Idaho is pretty conservative.

    Therefore, how could anyone even expect this character to be elected sheriff? Unless there’s a pocket of Democrats in them there Idahills… :-)

    Hopefully, he’s wasting his time running!

  7. BB-Idaho Says:

    Yes, he is probably wasting his time, although n Idaho has been a little squirrely for some time.
    Most peculiar, Idaho has the lowest number of blacks of any state. Democrats? They’ve been hunting them down….shhh, don’t rat me out!

  8. Mrs Wolf Says:


    5,456 blacks in Idaho as opposed to 21,787 in Alaska! That’s interesting, but understandable: in order to get the votes necessary to keep them politically relevant, the Democrats have the blacks mistakenly believing that the Republicans are the racists rather than the Democrats (who are the racists), so many blacks avoid GOP dominated states, thereby also avoiding success and its biproduct, independence.

    Democrats? They’ve been hunting them down…

    See? :-)

  9. Mrs Wolf Says:


    Further, though, I did try a search for black economic stats in Idaho vs NY or California, but could not seem to find what I was looking for.

    My purpose was to determine whether more blacks in a Republican state such as yours (apparently whether you like it or not, heh heh) are independent (working, in careers, etc) than in “the system” (on welfare and/or other social services programs) in Democrat states.

    After all, conservatives tend to look more toward fostering self sufficiency than dependence on the taxpayer, and in a GOP state, one would assume this is what one would find.

    Have you any idea where to look within the online resources of your home state?

    I would much appreciate it.