April 19, 2010
A Second, Albeit Short Post…
…for today.
When I was in New York a couple of years ago, I was approached by some guy with a clipboard who wanted me to sign a petition advocating homosexual “rights”, specifically same sex marriage — as a federal issue.
I told him that I believed such issues, which are not Constitutionally within the purview of the federal government, belong to the individual states to decide upon.
He, of course, disagreed, but that’s about what you can expect from a “progressive”, part of a left wing bastardization of the Democrats, in fact now the owners of that once patriotic, mostly Constitution-respecting party, who endorse micromanagement of our nation through oversized, overregulating, overtaxing government and the abolishment of states’ rights as they interfere too much with the facist ambitions of these portsiders.
While I do not endorse dictating what consenting adults do behind closed doors, I strongly object to the sexual deviations of a few being made into a subject of federal legislation, in effect the legalization of forcing the American people, by law, to accept and absorb carnal behavior that neither their religious beliefs nor their sensibilities condone.
Pro-family advocate Andrea Lafferty is warning about the potential ramifications of ENDA, pro-homosexual legislation that has been revived in Congress.
Congress is moving ahead on plans to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009 (H.R. 3017). The bill presents a lot of problems, according to Andrea Lafferty of the Traditional Values Coalition, who says it requires that every state, local, and federal government and businesses with 15 or more employees comply with the law.
“A lot of people have heard of ENDA. What they’re not aware of is that they’ve added a term — ‘gender identity’ — to the bill,” she explains. “[That] means that every school in America will be forced to comply with the hiring of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgenders.”
And what about states’ rights? Lafferty tells OneNewsNow the bill will stifle laws in many states.
“Currently these 38 states do not allow for transgendered teachers in the classroom or ’special protections’ for transgenders,” she points out. “[But] what ENDA will do is…tell these 38 states ‘We’re overriding your law — and you must comply.’”
Lafferty says although transgendered people have a serious mental disorder, President Obama and congressional leadership want to protect them through ENDA. She suggests voters let their elected representatives know how they feel.
A committee vote on the legislation could come as early as Wednesday.
What’s needed is some sort of spray that will make these people go away!
http://hardastarboard.mu.nu/wp-trackback.php?p=1180
April 20th, 2010 at 9:30 am
” ..facist ambitions of these portsiders.” Ouch! My only brownshirt is a polo shirt, and that is a little tight around the waist. BTW, we note that certain TeaParty elements have targeted
Lindsey Graham as gay-could that be?
April 20th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
BB –
Lindsay Graham’s been pounded on that issue for years, as much because he’s a confirmed bachelor as anything else.
As yet, though, only he knows the truth (along with select, if he is gay, butt buddies, of course). I don’t know if he countenances a wide stance like a former colleague of his once did, though.
Truth to tell, if he IS one o’ them there, well, whatever turns him on, as long as he keeps it out of politics.
April 20th, 2010 at 12:55 pm
I think the “spray” you’re looking for comes in a multi-barrel option delivering metallic sprays of around 0.50 calibre “droplets”. Applying it in the right place and at the right time may be a little difficult however.
The Left always attemtp to centralise all authority and all power, but watch out, they will set up “local advisory” panels, what Lenin called “Street Soviets” to make sure you all speak the New Speak, and follow the instructions of Big Brother.
April 20th, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Gray Monk –
The spray you describe sounds like it would fit the bill enormously!
I still haven’t figured out why they call these people liberals, considering that they embody all the traits of facism.
April 21st, 2010 at 4:38 pm
“..a multi-barrel option delivering metallic sprays of around 0.50 calibre “droplets”. Hey! My kind of talk. That would be the Soviet
YakB-12.7 HRF, used on the Hind helicopter. (Can’t hold a candle to our GAU-8, Warthog-mounted ‘metallic sprayer”). But 50Cal, ah, the memories for this old fossil: restarting the Twin City Ammo Plant, 1966..a very young wunderkind was bemused by the equipment
left from WWII - carts for transferring pre-cartridge steel case draws, nicely lettered “50 Calibre zippers for slant-eyed gypers”
(I thought I saw old ‘Molly the Riveter’ lurking among the cosmolined annealers as well)
April 21st, 2010 at 5:34 pm
BB –
I got to shoot the Browning M-2 (several) in the 1970s, but at the time I was a very young obnoxiouskind.
“50 Calibre zippers for slant-eyed gypers” LOL!!!!
Was Ms. Molly T. Riveter the daughter of Mrs. Rosie T. Riveter?
April 22nd, 2010 at 9:45 am
“Was Ms. Molly T. Riveter the daughter of Mrs. Rosie T. Riveter?”
You got me. Us elderly have problems with remembering names, Saul…
April 22nd, 2010 at 10:01 am
“I got to shoot the Browning M-2 (several) in the 1970s, but at the time I was a very young obnoxiouskind.”
..Me too. But of all the weaponry we qualified on in officer training, the dang flamethrowers scared the crap out of me. They leak like a sieve! I was a lousy trainee, having marched an entire company into the side of a building. But redeemed myself thereafter in tactical training. After an all night patrol (in Alabama, pretty safe place, really) I drew company commander next day. I was so tired and pissed that when we came to an agressor roadblock (with a neat dual 50 cal mount on an old halftrack), I pinned them with the
heavy weapons platoon and took the two maneuver platoons up and over the wooded hill to the right: came down behind them and captured the entire agressor force, including the halftrack. heh
Wonder why they assigned me to CBR research? Yep, Lt. Fuzz.
April 22nd, 2010 at 12:46 pm
BB –
Flamethrowers! I must confess that I don’t think I’d pick up one of those unless I absolutely, positively needed to for survival reasons, or if I was at an amusement park and, to win a stuffed Reid, I had to set Pelosi to cookin’.